Montgomery Business Owner Shot in the Back While Fleeing Alleged Self-Defense Confrontation: Family Demands Justice as Evidence Contradicts Shooter’s Claims
In a shocking turn of events, the Montgomery community is reeling from the loss of Travis Jackson, a well-known local business owner, after an altercation turned deadly. On the evening of April 12th, 2025, a confrontation between Jackson and Litasha Washington, a woman who had been involved with him, ended in tragedy. The incident is raising critical questions about self-defense claims and the use of deadly force.
According to reports, Jackson, who owned a local auto repair shop, was attempting to leave Washington’s home when their argument escalated. Eyewitnesses suggest that Jackson was trying to leave the situation when Washington allegedly blocked his path. What followed would change the course of both their lives forever.
Witnesses say the argument became heated, but no one anticipated the fatal decision that Washington would make next. It is reported that Washington, in the midst of the confrontation, pulled out a firearm and shot Jackson twice in the back as he attempted to flee. The sounds of gunshots rang out, signaling the end of a life and forever altering the lives of those who knew Jackson.
Montgomery Police responded quickly to the scene, with Washington immediately claiming that she acted in self-defense. According to her, she feared for her life and believed Jackson posed a threat. However, a closer investigation of the scene tells a different story. Evidence gathered from the incident and testimonies from witnesses paint a stark contrast to Washington’s self-defense narrative.
For many, the question arises: how can shooting a fleeing man in the back be justified as self-defense? Police are now examining video footage from nearby surveillance cameras, which show Jackson running away at the moment he was shot. It’s a disturbing visual that contradicts any claim that Jackson was an imminent threat.
Legal experts are weighing in, with many pointing out that self-defense laws typically do not support the use of lethal force against someone who is attempting to retreat. “In many jurisdictions, the law allows a person to use force to defend themselves against an immediate threat, but once the threat is no longer present—particularly when someone is fleeing—it’s difficult to justify shooting them in the back,” said local defense attorney Julia Harris.
For Jackson’s family, the loss is incomprehensible. His cousin, Tasha Jenkins, spoke on behalf of the grieving family, expressing the deep pain of losing someone who had so much potential and so much left to give. “Travis was a man of integrity, a loving family member, and a dedicated business owner. He didn’t deserve to die like this,” she said tearfully. “We’re heartbroken, and we’re demanding justice for his death.”
Jackson’s shop was more than just a business to him. It was his passion, a place where he built connections within the Montgomery community, and a stepping stone for many aspiring mechanics. His unexpected death has left a void, not only in his family’s lives but in the community that relied on his expertise and warm presence.
As police continue their investigation into the shooting, the community is left to question the nature of self-defense and whether the deadly act was truly necessary. How far should one’s right to protect themselves extend, and where is the line between protection and excessive force?
For now, the Jackson family is left to mourn the loss of a loved one in a senseless and avoidable tragedy. Friends, family, and even local customers who knew Travis are left struggling with the stark reality of his untimely death.
As the investigation continues and more details come to light, many are calling for justice for Travis Jackson. The community stands united in grief, hoping that the truth will bring closure to a situation that has left everyone in shock and disbelief.